This piece requires percussive accompaniment. The tempo must remain absolutely steady, maintaining in tempo until the end. Consequently, as tempo-related expression becomes impossible, dynamic control and balance become crucial.

Regarding balance, the right hand should not play too loudly, but rather execute repeated notes leggiero to a certain extent, allowing the left hand, which provides timbral variation, to be heard.

Structural Analysis

Let's analyze this piece. Two distinct musical materials exist: one in measures 1-4 and another in measures 5-8. Upon reaching measure 9, the material from measures 1-4 returns. Measures 1-4 and 9-12 are identical, showing no variation. However, the melodic line changes between measures 5-8 and 13-16.

The melody in measures 13-16 is positioned higher, indicating an increase in tension.

In measures 17-20, a change appears in the first material. Measures 19-20 are not a repetition of measures 17-18, but rather introduce new scalar material. Measures 21-24 present a mixture of Material 1 and Material 2. Subsequently, observing measures 25-32, we notice that the positions of the materials have been inverted.

In essence, we can infer that the tension of this piece increases progressively towards the latter half. The forte marking at measure 29 can likely be interpreted as stronger than the forte marking at measure 1.

The final four measures should lead with a crescendo towards measure 32 (the last measure), concluding with a crescendo without applying any ritardando.